I’m coming to terms with the high probability that AI will write most of my code which I ship to prod, going forward. It already does it faster, and with similar results to if I’d typed it out. For languages/frameworks I’m less familiar with, it does a better job than me.
It feels like something valuable is being taken away, and suddenly. It took a lot of effort to get good at coding and to learn how to write code that works, to read and understand complex code, and to debug and fix when code doesn’t work as it should. I still remember how daunting my first “real” programming class was at university (learning C), how lost I felt on my first job with a complex codebase, and how it took years of practice, learning from other devs, books, and blogs, to get better at the craft. Once you’re pretty good, you have something that’s valuable and easy to validate by writing code that works!
Some of my best memories of building software are about coding. Being “locked in” and balancing several ideas while typing them out, of being in the zone, then compiling the code, running it and seeing that “YES”, it worked as expected!
It’s been a love-hate relationship, to be fair, based on the amount of focus needed to write complex code. Then there’s all the conflicts that time estimates caused: time passes differently when you’re locked in and working on a hard problem.
Now, all that looks like it will be history.
I wonder if I’ll still get the same sense of satisfaction from the fact that writing complicated code is hard? Yes, AI is convenient, but there’s also a loss.
Or perhaps with AI agents, being “in the zone” will shift to thinking about higher-level problems, while instructing more complex code to be written?
This was a section from my analysis piece When AI writes almost all code, what happens to software engineering?. Read the full one here.
Subscribe to my weekly newsletter to get articles like this in your inbox. It's a pretty good read - and the #1 tech newsletter on Substack.